There's numerous prompting techniques you can use to power Productised in the backend. In this guide we'll cover few-shot, zero-shot, chain-of-thought and prompt chaining methodologies.

The Value of Different Prompt Approaches

When building AI-powered products that generate dynamic outputs from form inputs (e.g., personalized roadmaps, checklists, plans, or insights), how you design your prompts matters.


Zero-Shot Prompting (Simple & Direct)

What it is:
You give a clear, specific instruction to the AI without showing any examples.

Use when:

  • Your task is straightforward (e.g. summarizing, listing, rephrasing).

  • You want to minimize complexity and keep outputs simple.

AI Product Use Case Example:
You’ve built a LinkedIn Bio Generator with one AI node. Your prompt might look like:

"Write a short, professional LinkedIn bio based on the user's job title: {form:job_title}, target audience: {form:audience}, and tone: {form:tone}. Keep under 3 sentences."

Best for:

  • First drafts

  • Simple content

  • Rewording and formatting tasks


Few-Shot Prompting (Provide Examples)

What it is:
You give a few short examples of what you want before asking the model to create a new version based on new inputs.

Use when:

  • You want the AI to mimic a specific tone, style, or format.

  • You’ve found that outputs drift or vary too much.

AI Product Use Case Example:
You’ve created a Testimonial Writer product. Your prompt might include:

Example 1:
Client: “I loved how quickly things moved.”
Output: “Impressed by the fast turnaround and responsive service.”

Example 2:
Client: “They understood our vision.”
Output: “Their ability to grasp our vision from day one was remarkable.”

Now, write a testimonial for: {form:client_quote}

Best for:

  • Mimicking tone/voice

  • Domain-specific content (e.g. therapy, design, coaching)

  • Templates with a specific structure

Tip: Keep examples short, and vary them slightly to show range.


Chain-of-Thought Prompting (Step-by-Step Reasoning)

What it is:
You guide the AI to break down the task into steps or logic, often by asking it to structure its thinking or rationale.

Use when:

  • Your product requires evaluation, analysis, or comparison

  • You want intermediate reasoning (e.g., priorities, trade-offs)

AI Product Use Case Example:
You’ve created a Goal Readiness Scorecard. In your prompt:

“Evaluate the user's goal clarity, motivation, and realism using their inputs:

  • Goal: {form:goal}

  • Clarity rating: {form:clarity}

  • Motivation rating: {form:motivation}

  • Realism rating: {form:realism}

Step 1: Identify potential strengths and challenges.
Step 2: Summarize in 2 sentences why the user may or may not be ready.
Step 3: Suggest 2 next steps.”

Best for:

  • Planning tools

  • Diagnostic assessments

  • Strategic recommendations

Tip: Use numbered sections or subheadings in your AI output format to reflect the reasoning process.


Prompt Chaining (Complex Workflows)

What it is:
You divide a complex task into sequential steps. The output of one becomes the input of the next.

Use when:

  • The final output requires structured transformation or multiple stages

  • You want greater control, modularity, or reusable logic

AI Product Use Case Example:
You’re building a Personalized Business Plan Generator with a prompt that incorporates 3 sequential steps

Step 1 – Extract Core Strategy
Prompt uses: {form:goal}, {form:niche}, {form:audience}
Output variables:

  • core_strategy

  • positioning_summary

Step 2 – Develop Tactical Plan
Prompt uses: {core_strategy}, {positioning_summary}
Output variables:

  • lead_gen_plan

  • delivery_plan

  • monetization_model

Step 3 – Output Final Plan
Prompt uses: {lead_gen_plan}, {delivery_plan}, {monetization_model}
Final Output: A 2-page, formatted business blueprint

Exemplar Completed Prompt With Chaining

You are a seasoned strategic planning assistant creating a Personalized Business Plan for a client.

The plan must be generated in three internally chained stages (Extract Core Strategy → Develop Tactical Plan → Output Final Plan) but returned as one cohesive 2‑page blueprint ready for display.

Tone: Clear, professional, actionable.
Audience: Entrepreneurs and small‑business owners.
Format: Bold section headings, short paragraphs (≤ 80 words), bullet points (≤ 16 words), and scannable layout.


✳️ Form Inputs

  • Primary Goal: {form:goal}

  • Niche/Industry: {form:niche}

  • Target Audience: {form:audience}


Chain the Logic Internally (no separate nodes)

Step 1 – Extract Core Strategy

  • Restate the business goal and niche clearly.

  • Identify the unique positioning and differentiators for the stated audience.

  • Internally produce:

    • core_strategy = 1–2 sentence summary of the core strategy

    • positioning_summary = 3 bullet snapshot of positioning

Step 2 – Develop Tactical Plan
Using core_strategy and positioning_summary you just derived:

  • Outline a lead‑generation approach tailored to the target audience.

  • Outline a delivery/operations approach aligned to the goal and niche.

  • Suggest a monetization model suited to the business type.

  • Internally produce:

    • lead_gen_plan = 3 bullet lead generation plan

    • delivery_plan = 3 bullet delivery/operations plan

    • monetization_model = 3 bullet monetization model

Step 3 – Output Final Plan (Single Deliverable)
Combine all prior internal outputs into a cohesive 2‑page, formatted business blueprint with the following named output variables:

  • page1_executive_overview = Executive Overview (uses core_strategy)

  • page1_positioning_snapshot = Market Positioning Snapshot (uses positioning_summary)

  • page2_lead_generation = Lead Generation Plan (uses lead_gen_plan)

  • page2_delivery_plan = Delivery/Operations Plan (uses delivery_plan)

  • page2_monetization_model = Monetization Model (uses monetization_model)

  • page2_next_steps = 3 actionable next steps drawn from the full plan

Return all of the above variables as distinct, clearly labeled sections ready for rendering. Each section should include a bold heading followed by its content block.

Best for:

  • Blueprints, playbooks, strategic frameworks

  • Products with multiple pages or tabs

  • Use cases where each step builds on the last

Tip: Always define your output variables clearly and test before chaining.


Which Prompting Style Should I Use?

ScenarioRecommended Method
Simple output (bio, headline, CTA)Zero-shot
Requires style mimicry or structureFew-shot
Requires structured reasoning or trade-offsChain-of-thought
Multi-stage process or personalized blueprintPrompt chaining

✅ Prompt Design Best Practices

  1. Always define the task. Avoid open-ended instructions like "analyze this." Say exactly what you want.

  2. Specify the tone and audience. Example: “Write in a professional but warm tone for HR leaders.”

  3. Set formatting expectations. Bullet points, section headers, word limits—all help reduce ambiguity.

  4. Use placeholder variables consistently. Always use {form:...} or {node_output:...} in your prompts.

  5. Avoid overload. Keep prompts lean—only include what's needed at each stage.


🔧 Testing Tips in AI Product Builders

  • Start with zero-shot. It’s the simplest and often works surprisingly well.

  • Add examples if output quality drops. Use few-shot only when necessary.

  • Split big prompts. If your output is messy, break into a prompt chain.

  • Use output variables. Don’t rely on raw text — structure your AI node outputs for better rendering.


💬 Common Issues & Fixes

ProblemLikely CauseFix
Outputs are vague or off-topicPrompt is unclearBe more specific, define audience and format
Tone/style varies too muchNo examples givenAdd few-shot examples
Output contradicts inputInput mapping issue or logic too complexUse structured reasoning or break into nodes
Final page is jumbledToo many tasks in one promptUse prompt chaining

🧩 Final Checklist

✅ Clear task and tone
✅ Specific format or output structure
✅ Proper use of input variables
✅ If multi-stage: prompt chaining with structured variables
✅ Tested across at least 3 input scenarios


By mastering these four prompting styles, you can design AI products that are not only dynamic and personalized — but also consistently accurate, valuable, and brand-aligned.