There's numerous prompting techniques you can use to power Productised in the backend. In this guide we'll cover few-shot, zero-shot, chain-of-thought and prompt chaining methodologies.
The Value of Different Prompt Approaches
When building AI-powered products that generate dynamic outputs from form inputs (e.g., personalized roadmaps, checklists, plans, or insights), how you design your prompts matters.
Zero-Shot Prompting (Simple & Direct)
What it is:
You give a clear, specific instruction to the AI without showing any examples.
Use when:
Your task is straightforward (e.g. summarizing, listing, rephrasing).
You want to minimize complexity and keep outputs simple.
AI Product Use Case Example:
You’ve built a LinkedIn Bio Generator with one AI node. Your prompt might look like:
"Write a short, professional LinkedIn bio based on the user's job title: {form:job_title}, target audience: {form:audience}, and tone: {form:tone}. Keep under 3 sentences."
Best for:
First drafts
Simple content
Rewording and formatting tasks
Few-Shot Prompting (Provide Examples)
What it is:
You give a few short examples of what you want before asking the model to create a new version based on new inputs.
Use when:
You want the AI to mimic a specific tone, style, or format.
You’ve found that outputs drift or vary too much.
AI Product Use Case Example:
You’ve created a Testimonial Writer product. Your prompt might include:
Example 1:
Client: “I loved how quickly things moved.”
Output: “Impressed by the fast turnaround and responsive service.”Example 2:
Client: “They understood our vision.”
Output: “Their ability to grasp our vision from day one was remarkable.”Now, write a testimonial for: {form:client_quote}
Best for:
Mimicking tone/voice
Domain-specific content (e.g. therapy, design, coaching)
Templates with a specific structure
Tip: Keep examples short, and vary them slightly to show range.
Chain-of-Thought Prompting (Step-by-Step Reasoning)
What it is:
You guide the AI to break down the task into steps or logic, often by asking it to structure its thinking or rationale.
Use when:
Your product requires evaluation, analysis, or comparison
You want intermediate reasoning (e.g., priorities, trade-offs)
AI Product Use Case Example:
You’ve created a Goal Readiness Scorecard. In your prompt:
“Evaluate the user's goal clarity, motivation, and realism using their inputs:
Goal: {form:goal}
Clarity rating: {form:clarity}
Motivation rating: {form:motivation}
Realism rating: {form:realism}
Step 1: Identify potential strengths and challenges.
Step 2: Summarize in 2 sentences why the user may or may not be ready.
Step 3: Suggest 2 next steps.”
Best for:
Planning tools
Diagnostic assessments
Strategic recommendations
Tip: Use numbered sections or subheadings in your AI output format to reflect the reasoning process.
Prompt Chaining (Complex Workflows)
What it is:
You divide a complex task into sequential steps. The output of one becomes the input of the next.
Use when:
The final output requires structured transformation or multiple stages
You want greater control, modularity, or reusable logic
AI Product Use Case Example:
You’re building a Personalized Business Plan Generator with a prompt that incorporates 3 sequential steps
Step 1 – Extract Core Strategy
Prompt uses: {form:goal}, {form:niche}, {form:audience}
Output variables:
core_strategy
positioning_summary
Step 2 – Develop Tactical Plan
Prompt uses: {core_strategy}, {positioning_summary}
Output variables:
lead_gen_plan
delivery_plan
monetization_model
Step 3 – Output Final Plan
Prompt uses: {lead_gen_plan}, {delivery_plan}, {monetization_model}
Final Output: A 2-page, formatted business blueprint
Exemplar Completed Prompt With Chaining
You are a seasoned strategic planning assistant creating a Personalized Business Plan for a client.
The plan must be generated in three internally chained stages (Extract Core Strategy → Develop Tactical Plan → Output Final Plan) but returned as one cohesive 2‑page blueprint ready for display.
Tone: Clear, professional, actionable.
Audience: Entrepreneurs and small‑business owners.
Format: Bold section headings, short paragraphs (≤ 80 words), bullet points (≤ 16 words), and scannable layout.
✳️ Form Inputs
Primary Goal: {form:goal}
Niche/Industry: {form:niche}
Target Audience: {form:audience}
✅ Chain the Logic Internally (no separate nodes)
Step 1 – Extract Core Strategy
Restate the business goal and niche clearly.
Identify the unique positioning and differentiators for the stated audience.
Internally produce:
core_strategy= 1–2 sentence summary of the core strategypositioning_summary= 3 bullet snapshot of positioning
Step 2 – Develop Tactical Plan
Using core_strategy and positioning_summary you just derived:
Outline a lead‑generation approach tailored to the target audience.
Outline a delivery/operations approach aligned to the goal and niche.
Suggest a monetization model suited to the business type.
Internally produce:
lead_gen_plan= 3 bullet lead generation plandelivery_plan= 3 bullet delivery/operations planmonetization_model= 3 bullet monetization model
Step 3 – Output Final Plan (Single Deliverable)
Combine all prior internal outputs into a cohesive 2‑page, formatted business blueprint with the following named output variables:
page1_executive_overview= Executive Overview (usescore_strategy)page1_positioning_snapshot= Market Positioning Snapshot (usespositioning_summary)page2_lead_generation= Lead Generation Plan (useslead_gen_plan)page2_delivery_plan= Delivery/Operations Plan (usesdelivery_plan)page2_monetization_model= Monetization Model (usesmonetization_model)page2_next_steps= 3 actionable next steps drawn from the full plan
Return all of the above variables as distinct, clearly labeled sections ready for rendering. Each section should include a bold heading followed by its content block.
Best for:
Blueprints, playbooks, strategic frameworks
Products with multiple pages or tabs
Use cases where each step builds on the last
Tip: Always define your output variables clearly and test before chaining.
Which Prompting Style Should I Use?
| Scenario | Recommended Method |
|---|---|
| Simple output (bio, headline, CTA) | Zero-shot |
| Requires style mimicry or structure | Few-shot |
| Requires structured reasoning or trade-offs | Chain-of-thought |
| Multi-stage process or personalized blueprint | Prompt chaining |
✅ Prompt Design Best Practices
Always define the task. Avoid open-ended instructions like "analyze this." Say exactly what you want.
Specify the tone and audience. Example: “Write in a professional but warm tone for HR leaders.”
Set formatting expectations. Bullet points, section headers, word limits—all help reduce ambiguity.
Use placeholder variables consistently. Always use
{form:...}or{node_output:...}in your prompts.Avoid overload. Keep prompts lean—only include what's needed at each stage.
🔧 Testing Tips in AI Product Builders
Start with zero-shot. It’s the simplest and often works surprisingly well.
Add examples if output quality drops. Use few-shot only when necessary.
Split big prompts. If your output is messy, break into a prompt chain.
Use output variables. Don’t rely on raw text — structure your AI node outputs for better rendering.
💬 Common Issues & Fixes
| Problem | Likely Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Outputs are vague or off-topic | Prompt is unclear | Be more specific, define audience and format |
| Tone/style varies too much | No examples given | Add few-shot examples |
| Output contradicts input | Input mapping issue or logic too complex | Use structured reasoning or break into nodes |
| Final page is jumbled | Too many tasks in one prompt | Use prompt chaining |
🧩 Final Checklist
✅ Clear task and tone
✅ Specific format or output structure
✅ Proper use of input variables
✅ If multi-stage: prompt chaining with structured variables
✅ Tested across at least 3 input scenarios
By mastering these four prompting styles, you can design AI products that are not only dynamic and personalized — but also consistently accurate, valuable, and brand-aligned.